Solutions

Same platform. Very different days.

A solo physician, a nine-location group, and a forty-hospital system are not buying the same thing — even when they are buying the same software. Here is what actually changes for each, what changes for the person doing the work, and what changes for the number your board looks at.

By practice type By outcome By role

By practice type

What changes when you are this size

Scale changes which problems are hard. It should not change which product you buy.

Independent practice

Everything in one place, live in weeks.

You do not have an IT department, and you should not need one. Clinical, scheduling, billing, the patient app, and the integrations all come from the same vendor, on one contract, with one bill and one place to call.

See pricing

Live in about six weeks, on a fixed implementation fee
No interface fees on included marketplace connections
Configuration you do yourself instead of buying services hours
Published pricing, so the CFO conversation happens once

6 wks

typical time to go live

Multi-location group

One standard, many ways of working.

Every site thinks its workflow is the exception, and half the time it genuinely is. Set the standards that must hold everywhere, then let each location own the rest — with a governance log showing exactly what diverged.

Multi-location tools

Central template and order-set libraries with delegated local authorship
Cross-location scheduling, coverage, and shared waitlists
One patient record across every site, no duplicate charts to merge
Roll-up analytics by location, provider, and service line

−38%

internal referral leakage

Health system

Governance without freezing a service line.

The trade-off between control and speed is a property of the software, not of health systems. Change is versioned, attributable, reversible, and promoted between environments the way code is.

Enterprise

System-wide standards with per-facility overrides and an audit of both
Dedicated infrastructure and regional data residency
Multi-facility cutovers sequenced by service line, with rollback criteria in writing
A financially backed SLA with the measurement method in the contract

2 days

to roll out a system-wide change

By outcome

Three numbers worth moving

Nobody buys an EHR because they want an EHR. These are the reasons people actually pick up the phone.

Cut documentation time

Get the evenings back.

After-hours charting is the clearest signal that software is failing the people using it. Ambient documentation writes the note, the chart puts what a clinician needs where they can reach it, and the inbox arrives already triaged.

See the AI

The visit becomes a structured note with discrete data, reviewed before signing
Chart layouts you configure so the next click is where the work is
Results, refills, and messages summarized, prioritized, and drafted
Keyboard-first charting with a command palette on every screen

18 min

weekly after-hours charting, per provider

Fill the schedule

A cancellation should refill itself.

Empty slots are the most expensive thing in a practice and the least interesting problem to solve by hand. Publish real availability, let patients book against your actual rules, and let the waitlist do the calling.

Front office tools

Online self-scheduling that honors the same rules as your front desk
Automatic backfill from the patients most likely to say yes
Reminders in the patient’s language and channel, from your brand
Utilization and no-show analytics by location, provider, and visit type

88.4%

schedule utilization

Get paid faster

Fewer denials, shorter days in A/R.

Most revenue is lost long before the claim goes out — at eligibility, at documentation, at coding. Catching it there is cheaper than appealing it later, and it is work software should be doing.

Revenue tools

Eligibility checked at booking, at check-in, and overnight for tomorrow
Coding suggestions with the supporting documentation quoted
Denial prediction before submission, with the specific reason
Underpayment detection against your own contracted rates

21.6

days in A/R

By role

The same system, from four desks

Software that is good for one role and miserable for the next three is how a practice ends up with six systems.

Clinicians

Fewer clicks. Faster charts. AI you can check.

Every unnecessary step is a chance to make a mistake and a minute taken from a patient. Task time is a measured outcome here, not a usability afterthought.

Sub-100ms chart navigation
A command palette and remappable shortcuts
AI drafts, you sign — always
The chart arranged for your specialty, not the average one

Charting

Practice administrators

Change it yourself. Today.

The settings that decide how your practice runs belong to you, not to a support queue. Templates, schedules, forms, terminology, permissions, and automations are all self-service.

No ticket, no downtime, no services engagement
Every change versioned and reversible
Automations you build on a whiteboard-shaped canvas
Dashboards a manager can drive without a data team

Configuration

Billers & RCM

A work queue, not guesswork.

Denials arrive mapped to a reason and a queue. Coding suggestions arrive with the text that supports them. The parts that are genuinely judgement calls stay with you.

Denials mapped to reason codes and owners
Approve-before-submit on every automated claim
Estimates from your own contracted rates
Remittance posted and reconciled automatically

Revenue cycle

IT & security too

The people who have to approve it get their own answers.

SSO and SCIM, roles you define, an immutable audit log, tenant isolation, configurable retention, and an export you can run yourself — documented rather than described on a call.

Security & trust

Not sure which one you are?

Bring the situation, not the category.

Most organizations are two of these at once. Tell us the messy version and we will show you the configuration that fits it.

Book a walkthrough See pricing first